Bundle of Bail Application samples Pakistan

 

Pre Arrest Bail Petition formats and Post Arrest Bail Petition formats
Pre Arrest Bail Petition formats and Post Arrest Bail Petition formats 

In the name of ALLAH, the most beneficent, the most merciful

 

Bundle of Bail Application samples Pakistan | Pre Arrest – Post Arrest

 

Information about Bail

 

In this article/ blog, not only bundle of formats of Bail petitions either Pre Arrest Bail petitions or post arrest bail petitions are given but other information relating to a Bail has also been provided.  Bail application formats given here are according to nature of offences / section wise.  

 

In Urdu, bail is called Zamanat  (ضمانت). After registration of FIR, the police tries to arrest the accused named in FIR but accused tries to avoid his arrest and in this regard he approaches the court of law to get bail.  Some offences are bailable and some are non bailable. The bail in bailable offences is definitely granted by the court because it is the right of accused to get bail in bailable offences, however, in case of non bailable offence, it is the discretion of court of the court either to grant or to reject bail, but before passing of any order either of dismissal or of acceptance, the court is bound to go through record, facts and evidence produced before it. The bail granting order or bail dismissing order must be a speaking order.

 

Bail before arrest, in case accused is not arrested

 

If accused of any FIR has been informed either by police or through any source that an FIR has been registered against him, the accused can obtain the copy of FIR and file a Petition for bail Before arrest / Pre Arrest Bail Petition / Darkhuwast Zamanat Qabal Az Griftari (درخواست ضمانت قبل از گرفتار) usually to the Sessions Judge. The bail petition is accompanied with FIR and other relevant documents in favour of accused as defense. In rare cases, a Pre Arrest Bail petition can be filed directly to High Court.  If bail petition is filed before Sessions Judge, the Sessions Judge may hear it personally or to entrust it to any other Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ).  

 

The Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge or Even Duty Judge whatever the case may be, send notice to,  the State / Police for bringing record of FIR, and also to the complainant for his appearance on next date of hearing.  In the same order, the accused person/ petitioners in Pre Arrest Bail Petition may be admitted to Ad-Interim Pre Arrest Bail (عبوری ضمانت قبل از گرفتاری)  and order the accused to furnish bail bonds for any amount as desired by court. The accused may be further ordered to join investigation before police and to appear before the court till final disposal of the petition.  

 

Following is the photo of order of Session Court, allowing ad interim bail of accused.

 

Order of Session Court in Bail petition 


After passing of the order, the accused has to furnish bail bonds as ordered by the court and also has to join investigation before Investigating Officer to prove his innocence. The Robkar given to accused should also be given to the Investigation Officer so that the police may not arrest the accused. The accused may produce any document in support of his innocence or may get record statement of witnesses in his favour.

 

On the other hand, the complainant also joins investigation and also produces any documents or witnesses before Investigating Officer in support of his version or allegations.

 

On the next date of hearing, the accused, complainant and police along with   record of FIR appear before the court. The Police or complainant or his counsel may oppose the bail of accused.

 

After hearing arguments of counsels of accused & complainant, version of police, and  also going  through the available record, the court either may accept pre arrest bail petition and to grant bail to the accused person or to dismiss the pre arrest bail petition and to re-call the ad-interim pre arrest bail already granted to the accused.

 

Bail after arrest, in case accused has been arrested by police

 

After registration of FIR, if the police arrest the accused person and bring him in police station, the police start investigation from accused and record his statement and the statements of others, who know about the facts. After arrest of accused, the police cannot detain the accused in its custody for more than 24 hours (one day) as per law because the police has to produce the accused before concerned Magistrate. If investigation is not completed  by the police within 24 hours and if police requires further physical custody of accused, it may request to the concerned Magistrate for getting physical remand, and the court may accept or dismiss the request of physical remand of police. The Court can also discharge the accused or may order of judicial remand (means an order for sending the accused to Jail)  and fix next date of hearing.

 

If the court makes an order for judicial remand (sending the accused to Jail), the accused is brought in the court on any next date, as fixed by the court.

 

In such situation, when the accused is in Jail,  for his bail, a Petition for bail after arrest / Post Arrest Bail Petition/ Darkhuwast Zamanat Bad az Griftari  (درخواست ضمانت بعد از گرفتاری)  can be filed.

 

The grounds of a bail petition, may vary and depends on facts of the case, law and many more things like delay in lodging of FIR, offences being bailable, falling of offences in non prohibitory clause, contradiction between medical and ocular evidence, accused being first offender, compromise effected between accused and complainant, case of civil nature converted into criminal one, accused is found innocent during course of investigation etc etc.  The FIRs are lodged regarding various offences, hence the grounds of bail can also be different and depends on the type of offence mentioned in the FIR.  Some Bail applications are filed before Session Judge, some bail applications are filed before Illaqa Magistrate, some bail applications are filed before Special Judge Anti corruption, some bail applications are filed before Special Judge, CNSA etc, some bail application are filed in High Court and some are in supreme Court after dismissal of bail application from the  lower courts.

 

Bundle of Formats of Pre Arrest Bail applications before Session Court

 

 

Format of Bail Application before arrest  (406 PPC / Criminal Breach of Trust)

 

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE RAWALPINDI

 

__________son of __________resident of __________

 

Petitioner

Versus

The State        

 

Respondent

                                    

PETITION FOR BAIL BEFORE ARREST UNDER SECTION 498 CR.PC IN CASE FIR NO __________DATED __________OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 406 PPC P.S __________, RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth:

 

1.               That the offence under section 406 PPC does not attract even from bare perusal of contents of the FIR. In fact, the matter between the parties is of purely civil nature but same has been converted into criminal one by way of lodging of instant FIR.

2.               That in the absence of clear entrustment mere breach of promise, agreement or contract does not ipso facto attract the definition of criminal breach of trust in terms of section 406, P.P.C. Reliance is placed on  2020 P Cr. L J 335

3.               That the main Head of Contract dated 10-06-2020, itself speaks that it is a partnership agreement, therefore no FIR can be lodged in the instant matter.

4.               That the instant FIR has been lodged by the police and complainant to pressurize the petitioner.

5.               That two cheques of Rs. 50,000/- were given by the complainant, one of which was not encashed and same was given by the petitioner to I.O meaning thereby the terms and conditions of agreement was not fulfilled by the complainant.

6.               That as per clause 5 of Contract, in case, the complainant wishes to take back his investment, he shall be bound to service three months notice in advance to other party but no such notice was served upon the petitioner.

7.               That the petitioner paid Rs. 80,000/- by way of 08 installments @ Rs. 10,000/- per month to the complainant, hence the total amount received by the petitioner has already been paid by the petitioner to complainant as above.

8.               That no offence is made out from the contents of FIR and from the nature of contract.

9.               That there are grounds for further inquiry into the guilt of petitioner which makes out the case to be one of further inquiry under section 497 (2) Cr.PC

10.         That the petitioner has been involved in the instant FIR with malafide intentions and ulterior motives.

11.         That the Petitioner is previously non-convict by any court of law.

12.            That the petitioner would suffer an irreparable loss, if arrested by the police.

13.         That the petitioner is ready to join the police investigation when and where required by the police. 

PRAYER 

Under the circumstances, stated above, it is therefore humbly prayed that the instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioner may kindly be granted bail before arrest.

Ad interim bail is also prayed for.

Petitioner

Through

                                                                  

CERIFICATE

As per instructions received, it is certified that this is the first  petition for bail before arrest being moved before this Honourable Court.

 

Counsel

 

 

Format of Bail Application Before Arrest (489-F/ Cheque Dishonour)

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE ISLAMABAD

 

_____________son of _____________R/O _______________________________________

…Petitioner

                                Vs

The State

…Respondent

 

CASE F.I.R NO. _____________DATED _____________OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 489-F, PPC POLICE STATION _____________ISLAMABAD .

 

PETITION U/S 498  CR.P.C FOR THE GRANT OF BAIL BEFORE  ARREST

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

1.               That the cheque in question was misplaced by the petitioner, and in this regard,    a Rapt No. ____, dated ____ was also lodged in Police Station __________.

2.               That the signatures mentioned on the Cheque in  question are not of petitioner and Bank's witness in his statement under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("the Code") has stated that the signature on the said cheque does not match with the petitioner's signature in Bank's record

3.               That the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case with malafide and ulterior motives of the complainant as well as of local police.

4.               That the petitioner is the victim of purposely, deliberately, concocted, frivolous, baseless FIR register to satisfy the grudge of complainant.

5.               That the petitioner never borrowed any kind of money, absolutely no loan has been taken by the petitioner. Furthermore, there was no nexus between the petitioner and the complainant of any kind. There were no financial  transaction between the parties ever since.

6.               That being an affluent person the instant FIR is registered not just to deprive the petitioner for his lawful and ethical remuneration and commission duly payable by complainant but also to make petitioner suffer in mental torture by curtailing its basic fundamental right of liberty. 

7.               That the case against the petitioner is one of the further inquiry and probe. It is pertinent to mention here that the story of the complainant is  monotonous and vituperative in nature and it is  a dreadful and appalling lie.

8.               That there is no incriminating evidence available against the petitioner to connect him with commission of said offence.  The said cheque/ instrument was  stolen by the  complainant and is misused purposely.

9.               That the petitioner is previously non convict having unblemished record of has life and he is not even involved in any other case.

10.         That even other wise offence U/S 489-F PPC provide maximum punishment of 3 years or fine or both and does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.PC. Thus the bail is a rule while its refusal and exception and no exceptional circumstance is exist in the present case for refusal of bail.  

11.         That the petitioner is ready to furnish adequate surety to the satisfaction of this Learned Court and also ready to join the Police investigation.

PRAYER:

In the circumstances, it is therefore, respectfully prayed that the petitioner may graciously be released on bail before arrest till the final decision of the case.

 

Ad-Interim bail is also prayed for. 

Petitioner

 

Through

 

Counsel

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received, it is certified that this is the first bail petition on the subject matter being moved before this honourable court.

Counsel

 

Format of Bail Application before arrest  (302 PPC)

 

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE RAWALPINDI

 

 

_______________________

 

 

….Petitioner

Versus

1. The State

2. _______________________

….Respondents

PETITION U/S 498  CR.PC FOR THE GRANT OF PRE ARREST BAIL IN CASE FIR NO. _______ DATED ___________OFFENCE U/S 302/34 PPC P.S ___________RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth:

 

1.               That the story of FIR is false fictitious and baseless

2.               That the petitioner has no concern with the commission of offence mentioned in the FIR by the complainant.

3.               That the petitioner is not nominated in FIR, he was nominated in this case at belated stage through a supplementary statement given by the complainant with malafide intention and ulterior motives.

4.               That at the time of occurrence, the petitioner  was neither present at the place of occurrence nor he participated in the occurrence.

5.               That the petitioner is victim of malicious prosecution.

6.               That no direct or indirect cogent evidence is available against the petitioner.

7.               That the case of the petitioner is calls for further inquiry and probe.

8.               That co-accused namely _____has been granted after arrest bails from the Honourable Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi.

9.               That the petitioner is previously non-convicted

10.         That the petitioner is ready to join police investigation as and when it is required.

11.         That the petitioner is ready to furnish surety bond for the satisfaction of this Honourable Court.

 

PRAYER:

 

Under the above mentioned circumstances it is therefore respectfully prayed that petitioner may kindly be enlarged on pre arrest bail till the final disposal of the petition.

 

Ad interim bail is also prayed for.

 

Petitioner

 

Through

 

 

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received, it is certified that this is the first pre arrest bail petition on the subject matter being moved before this honourable court.

Counsel

 

 

 

Format of Petition for bail before arrest (Cross Version FIR)

 

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE RAWALPINDI

 

1.               __________S/O _______R/O ___________________

2.               __________S/O _______R/O ___________________

 

….Petitioners

Versus

The state        

….Respondent

 

PRE ARREST BAIL PETITION U/S 498 CR.PC, IN CASE FIR NO _______, DATED _______. OFFENCE U/S 337 F(I), 506-II, 148/149 PPC ACCORDING TO CROSS VERSION IN DAILY DAIRY NO. 4 STATEMENT NO. 3, UNDER SECTION 337F(V)/34 PPC, P.S _______, DISTRICT _______

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

1. That the instant FIR is lodged against the present petitioners on the basis of cross version as petitioner  No. 1 is the complainant of FIR No. 243 dated 29-07-2013 at Police Station Kahuta, District Rawalpindi.

2. That the present petitioners have been involved maliciously, falsely just to pressurize them from prosecuting their case as they have been made accused in the same FIR No. by same police station regarding daily dairy No. 4 Para graph No. 3 Under offence 337F(v)/34 PPC.

 

3. The allegations leveled against the petitioners are totally false and frivolous having no truth in it. The Petitioners seeks the pre arrest bail among other on following grounds.

GROUNDS:

1.                  That the Petitioners have not committed any offence and are absolutely innocent.

2.                  The Petitioners are ready to join Police Investigation as and when required by the police.

3.                  That the Petitioners have apprehension of immediate arrest and humiliation at the hands of Police while acting malicious.

4.                  That the Petitioners are first offender and previously non-convicted by any court of law.

5.                  That the Petitioners belong to respectable family, if arrested, they shall suffer irreparable loss.

6.                  That the Petitioners are ready to furnish sufficient surety for the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

 

In the abovementioned circumstances it is very humbly prayed that the instant pre arrest bail petition may kindly be accepted till the final disposal of the case

Ad-interim bail is also prayed. 

 

….Petitioners

Through

 

        Advocate High Court

Rawalpindi

CERTIFICATE

 

Certified that this is the first bail before arrest petition being filed before this honourable court.

 

Counsel


Format of Petition for bail before arrest (Hurt Case)

 

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE RAWALPINDI

 

1. __________________

2. ________________

 

….Petitioners

Versus

1. The state

2. __________________

….Respondents

 

PRE ARREST BAIL PETITION U/S 498 CR.PC  IN CASE FIR NO ____/18, DATED _____________OFFENCE U/S 337A(I) 337A(II), 337A(III), 337F(I), 452, 148,149 PPC P.S _____________RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

1.  That the story narrated in the FIR against the petitioners and others is false,  frivolous and ill-founded.

 

2.  That the complainant has falsely involved the petitioners and others due to malafide intention and ulterior motives in connivance with local police.

 

3.  That the petitioners are previously non convicted by  any court of law,  hence  the case of petitioners  does not fall within the parameter prescribed in section 337N PPC as petitioners cannot be termed as hardened, disparate and dangerous criminal. It is also worth mentioning here that in the light of section 337N PPC, punishment under Tazeer cannot be awarded to an offender who is previously non convicted.

 

4.  That for the exercise of discretionary punishment of Tazir, guideline is provided in section 337N (2) PPC, where it is clearly mentioned that “in all cases of hurt, the court may,  having regard to the kind of hurt caused by him in addition to payment of Arsh award Tazir to an offender who is a previous  convict, habitual or hardened, disparate  or dangerous criminal”. Reliance is placed on PLD 2009 Lhr 312.

 

5.  That the proceedings against the petitioners are malicious, malafide and ulterior motives.

 

6.  That the offences do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.PC

 

7.  That there are grounds of further inquiry and probe into the guilt of the petitioners thus, the petitioners are entitled for bail before arrest.

 

8.  That the local police is out to arrest the petitioners and the petitioners shall suffer irreparable loss,  if arrested by the police.

 

9.  That the petitioners belong to respectable families and  previously non convicted.

 

10.         That the petitioners are ready to join the police investigation when and where required by the police. 

 

11.         That the petitioners are ready to furnish sufficient bond for the ample satisfaction of this Honourable Court.

PRAYER:

In these circumstances it is humbly prayed that the instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioners may kindly be admitted to bail before arrest till the final decision of the case. 

Ad interim bail is also prayed.

Petitioners

Through

 

 

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received, it is certified that this is the first petition on the subject matter being moved before this honourable court.

         

Counsel

 

Format of Petition for bail before arrest (Anti corruption Case)

 

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE ANTI CORRUPTION, RAWALPINDI

 

_____________________

 

….Petitioner

Versus

 

The State

….Respondent

PRE ARREST BAIL PETITION U/S 498  CR.PC IN CASE FIR NO. ____, DATED ____UNDER SECTION 420,468,471 PPC AND 5/2/47 PCA REGISTERED AT P.S ANTI CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT REGION, RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth:

 

1.    That the brief backdrop of the case is that the petitioner obtained admission in Public Health Nursing School situated at Attock in the year 1996. The petitioner was granted admission as she fulfilled the required criteria for admission. Thereafter, the petitioner after successful completion of the course/ training was awarded with the certificate of Lady Health Visitor.

 

2.    That this Honourable court is not bound by the sections labeled in the FIR. It is settled law that each and every ingredient of the offence is to be satisfied with the statement of the complainant in the FIR.

 

3.    That the allegations contained in the FIR are not supported by any evidence. Hence the offences are not made out against the petitioner.

                                                                             

4.    That the instant FIR has been registered in violation of the provisions of relevant law. It is well entrenched principle of law that thing required to be done in a specific manner should be done in that manner or should not be done at all.

 

5.    That the petitioner was granted admission after verification of the credentials required for admission. In consequence of which, the petitioner produced the original secondary school certificate, which was condition precedent for admission.

 

6.    That the instant case has been filed with malafide intentions and ulterior motives in connivance with the investigation agency jut to harass and humiliate the petitioner.

 

7.    That the investigation agency is out to arrest the petitioner and if arrested, the petitioner would suffer unjustified humiliation and irreparable loss. 

 

8.    That the petitioner is a married woman and mother of 5 children. Hence the petitioner is entitled for bail before arrest on this score alone.

 

9.    That petitioner is ready to join the investigation as and when directed by this Honourable Court.

 

10.                       That the petitioner is ready to furnish sufficient surety bond to the entire satisfaction of this Honourable Court. 

 

PRAYER:

 

Under the above mentioned circumstances it is therefore respectfully prayed that petitioner may kindly be admitted to bail before arrest till the final disposal of the main case.

 

Ad interim pre arrest bail is also prayed for.

 

Petitioner

 

Through

 

CERTIFICATE:-

Certified on the instruction received from the petitioner this is a second pre arrest bail petition on the subject matter, being moved before this Honourable Court. The First pre arrest bail petition was withdrawn as at that time judicial action was not recommended.                 

COUNSEL


 

Bundle of Formats of post arrest bail applications  

 

 

Format of Petition for bail after arrest (9C CNSA)

 

 

IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS JUDGE RAWALPINDI

 

__________________________

Presently confined in Central Jail, Adyala Rawalpindi

….Petitioner

Versus

The state        

….Respondent

POST ARREST BAIL PETITION U/S 497 CR.PC, IN CASE FIR NO _______, DATED _________OFFENCE U/S 9-C/ CNSA, P.S ______________,

 

Respectfully Sheweth

1.   That the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the above said FIR with malafide intention and ulterior motives on behalf of local police.

2.   The story narrated in the FIR is false and the petitioner is absolutely innocent, having no nexus with the allegation & the chars shown in the case and seeks his enlargement on bail inter alia on the following

GROUNDS

1.   That there is no direct evidence of the alleged occurrence mentioned in the FIR which makes the case of the petitioner of further inquiry and probe.

2.   That as the story of the police is false and the petitioner has been involved with malice and malafide intention, that is why there is no private independent witness, despite the fact that the occurrence is from a thickly populated area.

3.   That the offence alleged fall within the border line of 9b CNSA and the same does not fall in prohibitory clause.

4.   That the petitioner is a poor fellow working honestly round the clock for the livelihood of his kids and there is no other fellow to attend them and to provide food.

5.   That the petitioner is no more required for the purpose of investigation or inquiry of the case hence his confinement would serve no useful purpose except the mere incarceration.

6.   That the petitioner is ready to furnish solvent surety bonds to the satisfaction of this learned court in case he is enlarged on bail.

 

In the abovementioned circumstances it is very humbly prayed that he instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail till the final decision of the case, in the interest of justice.

Petitioner

Through

 

 

 

 

Certified that as per information furnished by the petitioner it is the 1st post arrest bail petition in this learned court.

Counsel

 

Format of Petition for bail after arrest  (9B CNSA)

 

 

IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE, CNSA RAWALPINDI 

 

 

In the matter of

 

 

__________________________

(Presently confined in Central Jail, Adyala, Rawalpindi)

Petitioner

Versus

The State

Respondent

PETITION FOR BAIL AFTER ARREST U/S 497 CR.PC IN CASE FIR NO. _____ DATED __________OFFENCE U/S
6/9-B 14/15 CNSA POLICE STATION ANF/RD
RAWALPINDI.

 

 

Respectfully Sheweth:

 

1.                That as per the contents of the FIR it has been alleged that the petitioner was apprehended by the ANF Authorities from the departure waiting hall of Bainazir Bhutto International Airport and allegedly recovered 69 Capsules containing 950 grams Heroine which was concealed by the petitioner while eating. Copy of the FIR is attached herewith for the kind perusal of this Honourable Court. (Copy of FIR is annexed as “A”)

 

2.                That the petitioner seeks bail on the following amongst:

 

 

GROUNDS

a.     That the petitioner is a senior citizen of Pakistan 75 years of old, heart patient since 2001. In the year 2005 when the petitioner was admitted in Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore due to severe heart attack, breakage of four stud (valves). Doctors conducted surgery of petitioner and four artificial studs were installed in the patient Cardiac (heart). Now petitioner is regularly using the cardiac heart medicine and physically exercising as per advice of doctor.

b.    That petitioner is behind the bar for last 6 months and further detention of petitioner would serve no judicious purpose. In two occasions, when the petitioner’s health condition was critical, approached the Jail Hospital for treatment. Jail Hospital neither provided any heart medicine nor referred the petitioner to Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology. All the previous medical record of petitioner is attached for your kind perusal please. Hence, the petitioner is entitled for concession of bail on this sole ground.

c.     That the petitioner is absolutely innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case with malafide intentions by the ANF authorities just to show their fake efficiency.

d.    That the alleged recovery is planted and nothing was recovered from the possession of petitioner.

e.     That heroine itself a poison and dangerous for human life and it is not medically possible for a man to retain huge quantity of heroine in the stomach. So this sole ground is made the story of prosecution highly doubtful and make the  case of the petitioner for further inquiry and probe.

f.       That it is not acceptable by a prudent mind that a man can breathe while keeping 950 grams of heroine in his stomach and Airport Authorities issued Boarding Card and declared for traveling, hence story narrated in the FIR proved as false/ concocted.

g.     That there is a modern screening system installed in the Airport and it is not possible for a man having huge quantity of narcotics, to be declared as clear for traveling.

h.    That the investigation in the instant matter has already been completed and petitioner is no more required for further investigation and further detention of the accused would not serve for any useful purpose.

i.       That the case against the petitioner is one of the further inquiry and there is not even a scintilla of evidence which could connect the petitioner with commission of any offence.

j.       That in the light of situation referred supra this is a fit case of further inquiry and probe meaning there by section 497 (2) attracts with full vigor and stringency.

k.    That the petitioner is behind the bar for last almost four months and bail cannot withheld as punishment.

l.       That the petitioner is previously non-convicted.

m.  That even in the light of alleged circumstances, the ingredients of the offences leveled against do not spell out, furthermore, the offences with which the petitioner is charged to not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.PC   as well/

n.    That the petitioner is ready to furnish adequate surety according to the satisfaction of this Honourable Court.

PRAYER:

 

          Under these all circumstances, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioner may kindly be granted bail after arrest till the final disposal of the main case. 

 

Petitioner

Through

Advocate High Court

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received,  it is certified that this is the second bail petition on the subject matter being moved before this honourable court. First bail petition was dismissed by this Honourable Court vide order dated _________while bail of the co-accused has been granted by the Honourable High Court Lahore, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi on ________.

Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Format of Petition for bail after arrest  (381-A PPC)

 

IN THE COURT OF ILLAQA MAGISTRATE P.S ___________RAWALPINDI

 

___________________Caste ___________________resident of ___________________

Presently confined in Central Jail, Adyala, Rawalpindi

 

…Petitioner

                                Vs

 

The State

                                                                …Respondent

 

IN CASE F.I.R NO. _____, DATED _____OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 381-A,411PPC POLICE STATION _____, RAWALPINDI

 

PETITION U/S, 497 CR.P.C FOR THE GRANT OF BAIL AFTER ARREST

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

 

1.     That petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant false and frivolous case with the connivance of police station __________, who arrested the present petitioner in a case FIR No. _____/2017 registered with P.S _____and later on, foisted and planted the fake recoveries against the present petitioner. (copy of FIR is annexed herewith).

 

2.     That  the petitioner seeks bail after arrest on the following grounds:-

 

GROUNDS

 

                                          i.            That the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant false and frivolous case with malafide intention and ulterior motives and the complainant is playing in the hands of local police.

                                       ii.            That Officials of police station ________ arrested the present petitioner on __________and kept him under illegal and unlawful custody till 29-11-2017 and subsequently when the present petitioner fulfill their illegal demands of gratification, the instant FIR along with number of unknown FIRs were registered against the present petitioner.

                                    iii.            That no incriminating material/ article was recovered from the possession of present petitioner and the local police foisted and  planted the fake recovery against the present petitioner.

                                     iv.            That whole the story of prosecution is tinted with malafide and malice  on the part of local police and complainant.

                                        v.            That initially, the FIR was registered against unknown person and subsequently, the present petitioner was implicated through supplementary statement, which has no persuasive value in the eyes of law.

                                     vi.            That it is settled principle of law that mere registration of number of cases did not disentitle any innocent person from the concession of bail and bail should not be withheld as a punishment. 

                                  vii.            That the offences leveled against the present petitioner do not fall within the ambit of prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.PC. In such like cases, if the bail is not allowed, it would amount pre trial incarceration.

                               viii.            That the petitioner is ready to submit sufficient surety bond for the ample satisfaction of this Honourable court.

 

 

PRAYER:

 

In the circumstances, it is therefore, respectfully prayed that the petitioner may graciously be released on bail after arrest, till the final decision of case. 

 

 

Petitioner

Through

 

 

 

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received, this is the first bail petition on the subject ever filed by the petitioner.

 

                                        Counsel

 

Format of Petition for bail after arrest  (3/4  of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance 1979

IN THE COURT OF  JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, P.S. ___________, RAWALPINDI.

 

_____________________

Now confined in Central Jail, Adiala, Rawalpindi.

       

                                                ….Petitioner

 

                                Versus

 

The state

…Respondent

 

 

Offence  u/S 3/4  of Prohibition

(Enforcement of Hadd) Ordinance 1979

FIR No. ____dated: ____

                P.S. ____, Rawalpindi.

 

 

PETITION FOR BAIL AFTER ARREST U/S 497 CR.P.C.

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

 

1.               That allegedly 20 Liters wine were recovered from the petitioner.

 

2.               That the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case with malafides and ulterior motives. He is   innocent and has nothing to do with the alleged crime.

 

3.     That the petitioner has been sent to judicial lock up and no more required for investigation purposes.

 

4.     That article 4 is bailable whereas article 3 is not attracted.  Prosecution for the purpose of proving the charge of selling liquor is bound to produce the purchaser, the currency used for purchase and purchased intoxicant which are not available in the instant case.

 

5.     That the story narrated in the FIR is false and concocted one and is not believe able.

 

    6. That  the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497 CR.P.C.

 

7.  That section 103 CR.P.C. has been violated by the police.

 

8.  That the case is one of further inquiry and probe. Nothing has been recovered from the petitioners and the so called recovery is planted one.

 

9.   That no offence as alleged is made out against the petitioners.

 

  10. That the petitioner is not a previous convict.

    

   11.  That the petitioner is ready to furnish sufficient surety to the satisfaction of this Honorable court.

 

 

It is, therefore, prayed that the petitioner may be admitted to bail till the decision of case.

                                                        Petitioner

 

                                Through                 

Advocate , High Court.

CERTIFICATE

 

As per instruction received, it is certified as per instructions that this is the first bail petition on the subject matter being moved before Honorable court

 

        Advocate


High Court Bail applications Formats

 

Pre Arrest Bail Petition format High Court (279, 337G,  354, 427, 147,427,149, 452, 337FV)

 

 

 

IN THE HONOURABLE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH RAWALPINDI

                             Crl. Misc. No. _____B/2020

1. _________________

2. _________________       

3. _________________

                                                                               Petitioners

Versus

1.     The state 

2      _________________

                                                                              Respondents

PRE ARREST BAIL PETITION U/S 498 CR.PC  IN CASE FIR NO ______DATED ______OFFENCE U/S 279, 337G &  SUBSEQUENTLY ADDED OFFENCES UNDER SECTIONS 354, 427, 147,427,149, 452, 337FV PPC P.S ______________, RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

Brief and actual facts:

 

1.               On 13-05-2020, the petitioner No.1 parked his Vehicle bearing No. _______near complainant’s house (Mohallah Dar)). At about 6:45 PM before Aftari, _______(brother of complainant) came at the house of petitioners. 1 & 2 and started hitting/ damaging the main gate. Upon which both petitioner opened the main gate and _______ (brother of complainant) started quarrelling with the petitioner No. 1 and 2 that my son leg has been damaged by your parked vehicle. The petitioners No. 1 & 2 along with _______reached at the spot, where complainant, ____________________________were already present at the spot. The Petitioners No. 1 and 2 shocked to see that the vehicle was brutally damaged by the complainant, _______and their other family members. Due to hitting loud noise of iron gate of the house of Petitioner No. 1 & 2,   number of peoples of vicinity gathered at the spot. The Petitioners No. 1 & 2 and their father _______requested them to produce the alleged injured child so that his treatment could be made properly but neither _______or complainant nor any of his family members produced the minor injured aged about 2 years rather started quarrelling with petitioners No.1 and 2. Despite of requests made by _______ (Petitioner No. 3) along with other neighbourers, to leave the quarrel and settle the matter peacefully but the complainant remained adamant and also provoked his fellowmen for assault,  _______went at the roof of his house and  while having brick in his hands, extended threats for throwing brick/ killing the petitioner No. 1 etc.  (Various Photographs are annexed as annexure D). The petitioner No. 1 reported the matter to 15 Police. Before arrival of 15 Police, a person (whose name later on known to be “____”) wearing Police uniform (Muhafiz) who is relative of complainant, on call by complainant’s side, came at the spot straightened his pistol towards the petitioner No. 1 & others, and threatened by straightening his pistol towards petitioner No. 1 and others. He also, pressed trigger for Ariel firing but gone missed. Many peoples saw this occurrence from their own naked eyes. The eye witnesses have sworn their Affidavits in this regard (Affidavit by eye witnesses and statements of accused given during investigation are annexed as annexure E). After a while, police officials of 15 also reached at the spot and petitioner moved an application on the same day i.e 13-05-2020, to Girja Chowki and then to SHO, P.S Saddar Beroni (copy of application with receipt is annexed as annexure F) but no penal action ever taken against the complainant etc. Afterwards, with proper consultation and due deliberation, in counter to the application of petitioner No. 1 dated 13-05-2020, the above-said persons succeeded to get register false and frivolous FIR by leveling false, frivolous and abusive allegations. (Copies of FIR is annexed as annexure B),

2.               That the petitioner applied for Pre-Arrest Bail which was dismissed by the court of ASJ, Rawalpindi vide impugned order dated 25-06-2020 (annexed as annexure A) without considering the factual ground reality and malafide of the complainant party which is being assailed before this Honourable Court on following grounds

GROUNDS

1.               That the complainant, _________ and other family members severely damaged the vehicle of petitioner No.1 due to the grudge that the vehicle was parked near their house and petitioner rightly and quickly complained to the concerned quarter vide dated 13-05-2020 as per annexure “F” just to defeat the petitioner’s complaint by joining hands with the concerned notorious Investigating Officer, succeeded to get registered above captioned false and frivolous annexed as annexure B.

2.               Admittedly, no eye witnesses as mentioned in FIR has get recorded their statements to corroborate the version of complainant till today. Mere on the statement of fraudulent complainant, as well his wife, by ignoring the testimony of whole Mohallah Dar / eye witnesses, believe the imaginative story  cooked by the prosecution and refused to give relief to the petitioners, against the canon of justice.

3.               That on 02-09-2020, the petitioner moved a Petition under section 22-A, 22-B Cr.PC before Sessions Judge Rawalpindi for lodging of FIR on the application dated 13-05-2020. The malafide of police can been seen here that when the Investigating Officer came to know about the Petition U/S 22-A, 22-B Cr.PC, he on the very next date i.e on 03-09-2020  Vide Zimni No. 4, added only offence U/S 427 PPC for breaking the vehicle of petitioner No. 1, while other offences of life threats were not been added by the police due to malafide intention. Due to the grudge of petition U/S 22-A, 22-B Cr.PC, the Investigating Officer also added other offences under section 354, 354, 147, 149 PPC vide same Zimni against the petitioners to teach the lesson to them which is clear malafide on the part of local police.  (Order of Petition U/S 22-A is annexed as H)

4.               That the learned Judge ASJ, even ignored the basic principle for grant of pre arrest bail of malafide and ulterior motives of the complainant as narrated in case of Hidayat Ullah and Zubair. 

5.               That initially three versions were brought by the complainant regarding the alleged injured child  vide dated 15-05-2020 vide Impugned FIR, as well supplementary statement and Naqsa Madroobi prepared by the I.O. Even, there glaring contradictions between ocular and medical evidence which would be sufficient to prove the false story of the prosecution.  (MLC is annexed as annexure C)

6.               That the instant FIR has been lodged with malafide intentions and ulterior motives encounter the application dated 13-05-2020 filed by petitioner No.1, just to hide the illegal acts of  the prosecution. 

7.               That there is an inordinate delay of 2- ½  days in lodging of FIR and subsequently after deliberation, by joining ands with the concerned police, chalked out the false and frivolous FIR. 

8.               That the Torn clothes have not been taken into custody by the police till today. 

9.               That the petitioners are previously non-convict, having unblemished record of their lives.

10.         That the instant FIR has been lodged with malafide intentions and ulterior motives just to hide and cover up their above said illegal and unlawful acts and during the Inquiry and pendency of bail application, complainant along with I.O put maximum pressurize to compromise by withdrawing  the application dated 13-05-2020.

11.         That the concerned police is bent upon to arrest the innocent and respectable petitioners, if  the I.O is succeeded in his nefarious designs then the petitioners would suffer an irreparable loss to their respect, dignity and honour as well.

12.         That _________SI,  is investigating the matter on behalf of _________ SI, and tendered undue favour to the fraudulent complainant for extraneous reasons.  Even, application for change of Investigation vide Complaint No. RWP-6/10/2020-3927 dated 10-06-2020 was also submitted to CPO, which is still waiting for any legal action. (copy of application is annexed as annexure G).

13.         That no specific role whatsoever has been attributed to the petitioners rather general role just to spread the wider net.

14.         That the petitioners have already joined police investigation and have given their statements. The statements of petitioners and affidavits executed by the eye witnesses have also been incorporated in Police File during the course of investigation.

15.         That there are grounds of further inquiry and probe into the guilt of the petitioners thus, the petitioners are entitled for concession of bail before arrest.

16.         That the petitioners are ready to join the police investigation. 

17.         That the petitioners are ready to furnish sufficient bond for the ample satisfaction of this Honourable Court.

 

PRAYER:

In these circumstances it is humbly prayed that the instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioners may kindly be granted bail before arrest till the final decision of the case. 

    Ad interim bail is also prayed for.

Any other relief, which this Honourable court may deem fit and proper, may also be awarded.

 

Petitioner

Through

 

 

_________

CERTIFICATE

 

As per instructions received, it is certified that this is the first petition on the subject matter being moved before this Honourable Court.

Counsel

 

 

Pre Arrest Bail Petition format High Court (9C/CNSA)

 

 

IN THE HONOURABLE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI

                                        Crl. Misc No. __________/B/2022

ABC  son of DEF resident of DEF

….Petitioner

Versus

The state        

….Respondent

 

PETITION FOR BAIL BEFORE ARREST U/S 498 CR.PC,

 

 IN CASE FIR NO ___, DATED: ___U/S 9-C CNSA  P.S ___, DISTRICT ___

 

Respectfully Sheweth:-

 

1. That precisely allegations contained in the FIR are that complainant alongiwth other police Officials was present on patrolling duty within in the jurisdiction of  Moorat when at about 12:30 P.M a person came from Chakri Road Side on foot while holding a shopping bag bearing white Colour in his hands tried to slip away while observing the police party who was apprehended and during his personal research a charas  weighing 50 grams was recovered from his possession and name of the accused transpired as _____________ son of _____________ Allegations leveled in the FIR are false baseless and ill founded.

 

2. That petitioner is not nominated in FIR. No role whatsoever has been ascribed to the petitioner in the FIR in any manner whatsoever.

 

3. That Police with malafide intentions and ulterior motives while in connivance with the local rivals of the petitioner as falsely implicated in the instant case without any cogent reasons and evidence.

 

3. That it is settled principle of law that confession of the accused before police is inadmissible and it can not be used against co-accused in the light of Qananoon-e-Shahadat order 1984. 

 

4. That prima-facie even the FIR, name of the petitioner has not been disclosed by _____________ accused in any manner being involved in the instant case.

 

5. That the petitioner is blacksmith and earlier petitioner had been working with him as employee, but before lodging of the instant FIR, _____________ had given up employment of the petitioner and petitioner is not responsible for the acts and deeds of said _____________, if any.

 

6. That prior to the instant FIR petitioner had not been involved in any case relating to narcotics substance act and no FIR of such case has ever been registered against the petitioner.

 

7. That the petitioners apprehends arrest and humiliation at the hands of local Police.

 

8. That there are grounds for further inquiry into the guilt of petitioner which makes out the case to be one of further inquiry U/S 497 (2) Cr.PC

 

9. That petitioner undertakes to join the Police Investigation when and wherever it will be required by the Police.

10.       That the Petitioner is ready to furnish sufficient surety for the satisfaction of this Honorable Court.

        In the abovementioned circumstances it is very humbly prayed that he instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioner may kindly be admitted to pre-arrest bail in the interest of justice

 

         Ad interim pre-arrest bail is also prayed for till the final disposal of instant bail petition.

Petitioner

Through Counsel

       

 

 

CERTIFICATE:

As per instruction received from my client this is first bail petition on the subject matter ever moved before this Honourable Court.

 

Counsel

                                                                                      

 

 

Post Arrest Bail Petition format High Court (395/412 PPC)

 

IN THE HONOURABLE LAHORE HIGH COURT, RAWALPINDI BENCH, RAWALPINDI

 

Cr. Misc No. _____/ 2014

 

___________________

….Petitioner

Versus

          1.       The State

          2.       ________________________

Respondents

 

PETITION UNDER SECTION 497 CR.P.C FOR BAIL AFTER ARREST IN CASE FIR NO. ____, DATED ____________UNDER SECTION 395/412 PPC AT POLICE STATION ____________ RAWALPINDI

 

Respectfully Sheweth,

 

1.                          That earlier petitioner moved petition for bail after arrest before the Honorable Sessions Judge Rawalpindi which was dismissed by the court  vide order dated 17-04-2014.

2.                          That the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case with malafide intention and ulterior motives.

3.                          That initially case was registered U/S 392 PPC but in order to enhance the gravity of offence without any evidence local police in connivance with the complaint deleted the offence U/S 392 PPC and added offence U/s 395 / 412 PPC.

4.                          That the petitioner is innocent and seeks the bail after arrest on the following amongst other:

GROUNDS

a.          That the story of the FIR is totally false, frivolous vexatious and baseless against the present petitioner.

b.          That the petitioner is not nominated in the FIR.

c.          That from the perusal of the FIR, the date of registration of FIR is 07-02-2013 but the petitioner was arrested on an application given to Police by the complainant on 21-05-2013 after  delay of  at least three and half months.

d.          That no identification prayed was held in the instant case.

e.          That no description of articles/ gold ornaments is mentioned in the FIR or application  submitted to police.

f.            That the petitioner was arrested on 06-06-2013  and the police just to enhance the  gravity of offence, planted a fake  recovery on the present petitioner on 24-06-2013 i.e after the delay of 18 days when the petitioner was in judicial lockup.

g.          That the circumstances of the prosecution case ipso fact warrants from its further  inquiry and probe.

h.         That no offence is made out against the petitioner and the case is one of the further inquiry and probe.

i.            That the petitioner has been involved in the instant case with malafide intention and ulterior motives on the part of local police.

j.            That the alleged offences do not fall within prohibitory clause of section 497 Cr.PC.

k.          That the petitioner belongs to very respectable family and is previously non convicted.

l.            That the investigation of the case has been completed and petitioner is behind the bar since his arrest and is no more required for further investigation by the police.

m.        That if the petitioner is released on bail there is no chance of his absconder or tempering with the evidence, which is already in the hands of prosecution.

n.         That the petitioner is ready to furnish the solvent surety according to the satisfaction of this honorable court.

 

PRAYER:

 

In the above circumstances, it is respectfully prayed that instant petition may kindly be accepted and the petitioner may kindly be admitted to bail after arrest till the final disposal of the case.

 

                                                             Petitioner

Dated: __________

Through Counsel

CERTIFICATE

As per instructions received from petitioner, this is 1st post arrest bail being moved before this honorable court  and no other bail of the petitioner is pending in any court.

Counsel

 

 

 


Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post